The result was redirect. Consensus here that the articles don't independently meet notability criteria to warrant a standalone article. I've gone ahead and performed all the redirects, any content missing that needs merging can be done from article history. (non-admin closure) Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 02:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:GNG, and by extension WP:N, and the coverage is routine statistical listings. The subject made a single first-class appearance and is long since retired. Technically, the subject meets WP:CRIN, but this forms a part of WP:NSPORT, which clearly states that "the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept". Per this discussion, community consensus is that "subject-specific notability guidelines do not supersede the general notability guideline, except in clear cases where GNG does not apply." In these cases, coverage is so meagre that we do not even have the players full name. Given the era in which the subjects played (1830s and 1840s), it is extremely unlikely research will ever discover more. (Possible merge/redirects at List of English cricketers (1826–1840) or List of Cambridge Town Club and Cambridgeshire cricketers, though note that a lot of links from the latter lead to the former.) Harrias talk 08:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
The result was redirect. Consensus here that the articles don't independently meet notability criteria to warrant a standalone article. I've gone ahead and performed all the redirects, any content missing that needs merging can be done from article history. (non-admin closure) Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 02:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:GNG, and by extension WP:N, and the coverage is routine statistical listings. The subject made a single first-class appearance and is long since retired. Technically, the subject meets WP:CRIN, but this forms a part of WP:NSPORT, which clearly states that "the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept". Per this discussion, community consensus is that "subject-specific notability guidelines do not supersede the general notability guideline, except in clear cases where GNG does not apply." In these cases, coverage is so meagre that we do not even have the players full name. Given the era in which the subjects played (1830s and 1840s), it is extremely unlikely research will ever discover more. (Possible merge/redirects at List of English cricketers (1826–1840) or List of Cambridge Town Club and Cambridgeshire cricketers, though note that a lot of links from the latter lead to the former.) Harrias talk 08:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason: