- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Daniel J. Hunt
- Daniel J. Hunt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lack of notability valereee ( talk) 19:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment. The subject was apparently just elected a state representative in a special election on April 1.I am looking for a reliable news source to confirm this before I vote to keep. If confirmed, Dan Hunt passes WP:POLITICIAN.• Gene93k ( talk) 19:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Member-elect of a state legislature passes WP:POLITICIAN. RS confirmation found: " Democrats sweep Mass. special elections". Boston Herald. April 2, 2014. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Easily meets Part 1 of WP:POLITICIAN, which deems state legislators and "persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them" as notable. -- Hirolovesswords ( talk) 19:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Member of the Massachusetts legislature per • Gene93k Enos733 ( talk) 18:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Daniel J. Hunt
- Daniel J. Hunt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lack of notability valereee ( talk) 19:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment. The subject was apparently just elected a state representative in a special election on April 1.I am looking for a reliable news source to confirm this before I vote to keep. If confirmed, Dan Hunt passes WP:POLITICIAN.• Gene93k ( talk) 19:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Member-elect of a state legislature passes WP:POLITICIAN. RS confirmation found: " Democrats sweep Mass. special elections". Boston Herald. April 2, 2014. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Easily meets Part 1 of WP:POLITICIAN, which deems state legislators and "persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them" as notable. -- Hirolovesswords ( talk) 19:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Member of the Massachusetts legislature per • Gene93k Enos733 ( talk) 18:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.