The result was delete. The consensus is that the lack of independent reliable sources means that this band does not meet the criteria for inclusion -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Billboard link brings up a whole lot of "not available" nothing. Nothing else I can find that indications notability. Shadowjams ( talk) 07:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I cannot tell why Billboard has removed the article that was used for the reference in the first place, in any case I will remove it as a reference. However, since this is not the only reference to the article's notability, I can direct you to all the other references that prove notability. You can read the arguments on a previous deletion suggestion that resulted as "non consensus" to see how notability on this article is argumented. If you still need clarification, please follow up. Thanks Alexpts ( talk) 12:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply
On TenPoundHammer's comment: I never referenced any wikipedia article on the Danger Angel article. Please specify. Oh I saw it, I am removing it promptly. Did not know this rule. Please, explain why you consider all sources unreliable. All sources are credible, certified media. Please, explain. Alexpts ( talk) 11:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply
On Billboard reference issue. Billboard reference is active and valid Alexpts ( talk) 11:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply
1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following...
6. Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles.
11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
12. Has been the subject of a half-hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.
Alexpts ( talk) 22:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Alexpts ( talk) 19:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The consensus is that the lack of independent reliable sources means that this band does not meet the criteria for inclusion -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 23:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Billboard link brings up a whole lot of "not available" nothing. Nothing else I can find that indications notability. Shadowjams ( talk) 07:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I cannot tell why Billboard has removed the article that was used for the reference in the first place, in any case I will remove it as a reference. However, since this is not the only reference to the article's notability, I can direct you to all the other references that prove notability. You can read the arguments on a previous deletion suggestion that resulted as "non consensus" to see how notability on this article is argumented. If you still need clarification, please follow up. Thanks Alexpts ( talk) 12:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply
On TenPoundHammer's comment: I never referenced any wikipedia article on the Danger Angel article. Please specify. Oh I saw it, I am removing it promptly. Did not know this rule. Please, explain why you consider all sources unreliable. All sources are credible, certified media. Please, explain. Alexpts ( talk) 11:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply
On Billboard reference issue. Billboard reference is active and valid Alexpts ( talk) 11:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply
1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following...
6. Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles.
11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
12. Has been the subject of a half-hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.
Alexpts ( talk) 22:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Alexpts ( talk) 19:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply