From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Damien Lim

Damien Lim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a soccer player. Subject fails GNG for not having significant coverage by independent, reliable source for all of them either are not independent, not reliable or just passing mention including the Star Newspaper coverage which is an interview piece which make the soure not independent. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep He plays in the Super League which is fully-pro and the first and last citation from The Star seem in-depth to me. The Star website is independent, and I believe it is the oldest online news website in Malaysia and considered one of the most reliable. So I disagree with your assessment, this article has better sourcing than a lot of young English football player articles. Govvy ( talk) 09:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per this and this and this (all already in the article) which show GNG. Lazy & misleading nomination. Giant Snowman 21:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Per above. Player with ongoing career in the fully professional Malaysian top flight. Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk) 19:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep - While the !keep arguments above which rely on this footballer having an "ongoing career" or having played in a "fully pro" league should be ignored as they are contrary to WP:NSPORTS2022, I think there may be just enough coverage to indicate that the GNG could be met. I'm unimpressed with The Star's and Vocket FC's coverage, but H Metro has probably enough in interview/articles like the one GS noted and this. It would be easier to decide if there was more coverage of course. Jogurney ( talk) 05:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes GNG with significant coverage.-- Ortizesp ( talk) 05:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Damien Lim

Damien Lim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a soccer player. Subject fails GNG for not having significant coverage by independent, reliable source for all of them either are not independent, not reliable or just passing mention including the Star Newspaper coverage which is an interview piece which make the soure not independent. Cassiopeia talk 00:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep He plays in the Super League which is fully-pro and the first and last citation from The Star seem in-depth to me. The Star website is independent, and I believe it is the oldest online news website in Malaysia and considered one of the most reliable. So I disagree with your assessment, this article has better sourcing than a lot of young English football player articles. Govvy ( talk) 09:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per this and this and this (all already in the article) which show GNG. Lazy & misleading nomination. Giant Snowman 21:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Per above. Player with ongoing career in the fully professional Malaysian top flight. Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk) 19:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep - While the !keep arguments above which rely on this footballer having an "ongoing career" or having played in a "fully pro" league should be ignored as they are contrary to WP:NSPORTS2022, I think there may be just enough coverage to indicate that the GNG could be met. I'm unimpressed with The Star's and Vocket FC's coverage, but H Metro has probably enough in interview/articles like the one GS noted and this. It would be easier to decide if there was more coverage of course. Jogurney ( talk) 05:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes GNG with significant coverage.-- Ortizesp ( talk) 05:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook