The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 18:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Non notable martial artist. Has no accomplishments that meet
WP:MANOTE and the only source is his press release of an event he was sponsoring so there are no sources that show he meets
WP:GNG. Studying a bunch of different arts does not make him notable.
Mdtemp (
talk) 15:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete As per nominator. I have been sitting on nominating this myself and after applying a series of tags was hoping that the issues could be addressed. Right now it seems like a heavily padded CV and although I cut out the worst of the language - heavily promotional. There is not the coverage that would lead me to think differently.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 15:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Even I can't find a reason to keep him.
CrazyAces489 (
talk) 16:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I must admit this made me smile.
Papaursa (
talk) 20:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Ridiculously promotional and with all that puffery, there still isn't anything getting him past notability.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 22:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete There is nothing to show he's a notable martial artist and I found no significant independent coverage of him.
Papaursa (
talk) 20:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 18:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Non notable martial artist. Has no accomplishments that meet
WP:MANOTE and the only source is his press release of an event he was sponsoring so there are no sources that show he meets
WP:GNG. Studying a bunch of different arts does not make him notable.
Mdtemp (
talk) 15:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete As per nominator. I have been sitting on nominating this myself and after applying a series of tags was hoping that the issues could be addressed. Right now it seems like a heavily padded CV and although I cut out the worst of the language - heavily promotional. There is not the coverage that would lead me to think differently.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 15:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Even I can't find a reason to keep him.
CrazyAces489 (
talk) 16:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I must admit this made me smile.
Papaursa (
talk) 20:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Ridiculously promotional and with all that puffery, there still isn't anything getting him past notability.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 22:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete There is nothing to show he's a notable martial artist and I found no significant independent coverage of him.
Papaursa (
talk) 20:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.