- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, WP:CSD#A7 (nomination withdrawn) ( non-admin closure) davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 18:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DJ Malyk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AFD instead of
WP:CSD#G11 or quickly moving it back to draft: space to prevent re-creation without discussion. Edit summary of
this edit says Malyk Writes moved page Draft:DJ Malyk to DJ Malyk: He's a DJ, so he deserves a wiki article to enhance his audience. And it'll make easier for people to know about the life of DJ Malyk. I'll provide additional information on this article, and will be improving the article, day by day
which justifies a G11 deletion.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)
13:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 13:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 13:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Information: Another editor put a G11 tag on the page recently. A non-logged in editor whose only edits are to this article removed it. Had I seen the G11 template, I'm not sure if I would have "let it go" or replaced it with this AFD. I obviously want this gone, but I think the AFD process will send a stronger message and provide better protection against re-creation. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 13:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- speedy delete as per my original tag, which I've restored. This is pointless to even discuss (but thanks for trying to get it gone!) Praxidicae ( talk) 15:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, WP:CSD#A7 (nomination withdrawn) ( non-admin closure) davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 18:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DJ Malyk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AFD instead of
WP:CSD#G11 or quickly moving it back to draft: space to prevent re-creation without discussion. Edit summary of
this edit says Malyk Writes moved page Draft:DJ Malyk to DJ Malyk: He's a DJ, so he deserves a wiki article to enhance his audience. And it'll make easier for people to know about the life of DJ Malyk. I'll provide additional information on this article, and will be improving the article, day by day
which justifies a G11 deletion.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)
13:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 13:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 13:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Information: Another editor put a G11 tag on the page recently. A non-logged in editor whose only edits are to this article removed it. Had I seen the G11 template, I'm not sure if I would have "let it go" or replaced it with this AFD. I obviously want this gone, but I think the AFD process will send a stronger message and provide better protection against re-creation. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 13:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- speedy delete as per my original tag, which I've restored. This is pointless to even discuss (but thanks for trying to get it gone!) Praxidicae ( talk) 15:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.