From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply

D. S. R. Wanaguru

D. S. R. Wanaguru (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:ANYBIO. The subject was only a deputy inspector general of police, the third most senior rank in the Sri Lanka Police Service, which does warrant auto-notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) is Senior gazetted officer of Sri Lanka Police, should not be deleted instead allow the article to be further improved. DilJco ( talk) 07:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Comment @ DilJco: just because they are/were a senior police officer does not make them automatically notable. Clearly fails to satisfy the requirements under WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt ( talk) 09:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The coverage is WP:ROUTINE coverage of promotions and assignments. No indication that theres is significant, independent coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply

D. S. R. Wanaguru

D. S. R. Wanaguru (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:ANYBIO. The subject was only a deputy inspector general of police, the third most senior rank in the Sri Lanka Police Service, which does warrant auto-notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) is Senior gazetted officer of Sri Lanka Police, should not be deleted instead allow the article to be further improved. DilJco ( talk) 07:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Comment @ DilJco: just because they are/were a senior police officer does not make them automatically notable. Clearly fails to satisfy the requirements under WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt ( talk) 09:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The coverage is WP:ROUTINE coverage of promotions and assignments. No indication that theres is significant, independent coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook