The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Beny Steinmetz is notable. Everything he does is notable. I grant you that source 2 is ridiculous and 3 is weak, 1 is an industry newsletter as far as I can tell. Whether these particular shell companies are notable enough for their own article is another question. If not a summary of this should be merged into the article for the parent company.
Elinruby (
talk)
07:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. Additional cites provided above do not establish notability (first one doesn't even mention the company) and at most give incidental mention of it, not a focus on it. Therefore fails
WP:NCORP. Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
09:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete and/or merge with
Beny Steinmetz. Sources cited in the article (and brought up by Chirota) are either unreliable or are not providing significant coverage of this particular company. However, a few sentences about Cunico could possibly be added to
Beny Steinmetz.
JBchrch (
talk)
14:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Unlike Chirota I'm of an opinion that the subject would have to meet the criteria of NCORP (which it clearly doesn't), not merely GNG.
— Alalch Emis (
talk)
18:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Beny Steinmetz is notable. Everything he does is notable. I grant you that source 2 is ridiculous and 3 is weak, 1 is an industry newsletter as far as I can tell. Whether these particular shell companies are notable enough for their own article is another question. If not a summary of this should be merged into the article for the parent company.
Elinruby (
talk)
07:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. Additional cites provided above do not establish notability (first one doesn't even mention the company) and at most give incidental mention of it, not a focus on it. Therefore fails
WP:NCORP. Best
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
09:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete and/or merge with
Beny Steinmetz. Sources cited in the article (and brought up by Chirota) are either unreliable or are not providing significant coverage of this particular company. However, a few sentences about Cunico could possibly be added to
Beny Steinmetz.
JBchrch (
talk)
14:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Unlike Chirota I'm of an opinion that the subject would have to meet the criteria of NCORP (which it clearly doesn't), not merely GNG.
— Alalch Emis (
talk)
18:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.