![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 April 10. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2012 September 6. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Consensus is fairly clear. Note the last two !votes were added by the same IP at the same time. Courcelles 11:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 March 18. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This article has been substantially revised since an initial deletion in February of 2011. It now contains sources from several wide-circulation newspapers including the Oregonian, in addition to a story from the Associated Press. The show is nationally-recognized and more than worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. Stumptowner ( talk) 10:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 April 10. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2012 September 6. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Consensus is fairly clear. Note the last two !votes were added by the same IP at the same time. Courcelles 11:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 March 18. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This article has been substantially revised since an initial deletion in February of 2011. It now contains sources from several wide-circulation newspapers including the Oregonian, in addition to a story from the Associated Press. The show is nationally-recognized and more than worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. Stumptowner ( talk) 10:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC) reply