![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 October 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 16:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The article is a jumble of unstructured and in many places nonsensical information. It is purely OR and the article comprises of almost exclusively tables without prose. This article is not suitable for an encylopedia in its current form, and I don't see how it ever can be. Jonathan McLeod ( talk) 00:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 October 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 16:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The article is a jumble of unstructured and in many places nonsensical information. It is purely OR and the article comprises of almost exclusively tables without prose. This article is not suitable for an encylopedia in its current form, and I don't see how it ever can be. Jonathan McLeod ( talk) 00:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply