- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 15:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Comparison of PDF presentation software
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Comparison of PDF presentation software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has the same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins (2nd nomination)/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of power management software suites/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software/etc. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all but one entry appear to have no claimed reason for notability, so there's no way to establish a useful WP:LSC. Lists (and by extension to an extent, comparisons) of mostly non-notable things are generally non-notable unless there's a clear argument that the broader topic is notable, and I can't think of one here. See also my vote at the XMPP comparisons AfD for a general argument against including these styles of comparison at all: WP:NOTDIRECTORY and the very construction of the page constitutes WP:SYNTH, but these articles have enough prevalence on the wiki that I feel like a broader discussion is merited, so I'm voting here on the more stringent criteria of notability that this seems to fail. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 18:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Software, and Lists. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 15:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Comparison of PDF presentation software
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Comparison of PDF presentation software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has the same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins (2nd nomination)/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of power management software suites/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software/ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software/etc. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all but one entry appear to have no claimed reason for notability, so there's no way to establish a useful WP:LSC. Lists (and by extension to an extent, comparisons) of mostly non-notable things are generally non-notable unless there's a clear argument that the broader topic is notable, and I can't think of one here. See also my vote at the XMPP comparisons AfD for a general argument against including these styles of comparison at all: WP:NOTDIRECTORY and the very construction of the page constitutes WP:SYNTH, but these articles have enough prevalence on the wiki that I feel like a broader discussion is merited, so I'm voting here on the more stringent criteria of notability that this seems to fail. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 18:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Software, and Lists. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.