This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2008 June 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete all. Related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Coeur Saignant Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Procedural Nomination for article re-PROD'd after having had a declined PROD. There are two main concerns: a) verifiability of the place's existence and b) notability of the place. It is my understanding that if an inhabited place is verifiable, that place is intrinsically notable. However, it has been a while since I have been involved in a debate on that matter and consensus may have changed. Thanks for your input. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason for AfD, edit history and editors involved are essentially identical:
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2008 June 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete all. Related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Coeur Saignant Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Procedural Nomination for article re-PROD'd after having had a declined PROD. There are two main concerns: a) verifiability of the place's existence and b) notability of the place. It is my understanding that if an inhabited place is verifiable, that place is intrinsically notable. However, it has been a while since I have been involved in a debate on that matter and consensus may have changed. Thanks for your input. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason for AfD, edit history and editors involved are essentially identical: