The result was keep. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this on behalf of one of the primary editors of the page ( User:Karendawes), who has been requesting speedy deletions as the main editor of the page. Myself and another editor declined it due to there being some edits (mostly minor) by other users as well as the article surviving an AfD about a year ago. That makes deletion through WP:G7 a little murky, as it sort of ceases to be something she created herself. Rather than have her nominate it again, I thought that it would be better if it got another deletion discussion. There are some assertions to notability here, but I'm not sure where his medal would rank on WP:FIGURE/N. I have no true opinion on this, but I thought that since the editor in question seems to want it deleted I would run it through AfD. I'm slightly hesitant about this since it did pass a previous AfD, but this would probably be a better route to go than to repeatedly decline speedies. This way if it's decided to keep based upon notability standards, it can be pulled from at various angles. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply
'Keep' I withdraw my request to delete at the request of the subject of the article. Karendawes ( talk) 17:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this on behalf of one of the primary editors of the page ( User:Karendawes), who has been requesting speedy deletions as the main editor of the page. Myself and another editor declined it due to there being some edits (mostly minor) by other users as well as the article surviving an AfD about a year ago. That makes deletion through WP:G7 a little murky, as it sort of ceases to be something she created herself. Rather than have her nominate it again, I thought that it would be better if it got another deletion discussion. There are some assertions to notability here, but I'm not sure where his medal would rank on WP:FIGURE/N. I have no true opinion on this, but I thought that since the editor in question seems to want it deleted I would run it through AfD. I'm slightly hesitant about this since it did pass a previous AfD, but this would probably be a better route to go than to repeatedly decline speedies. This way if it's decided to keep based upon notability standards, it can be pulled from at various angles. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply
'Keep' I withdraw my request to delete at the request of the subject of the article. Karendawes ( talk) 17:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply