The result was keep. J04n( talk page) 04:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC) reply
There are no references provided to substantiate that this is not original research, or entirely fabricated. The concepts make sense, are rational, reasonable, but there is no indication as to when or from whom (neither deity nor person) that this concept originated.
While there are two references, both books, neither book is cited nor mentioned in the article itself. The reference section, which lists the books, does not specify the relevant chapter or page number or quote from either book; any of those would be supportive, probably adequate. The book titles don't indicate that they are about anything other than general theology. FeralOink ( talk) 18:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Finally, there are "citation needed" tags in the article that show it being tagged since 2008, yet no progress has been made in adding citations where it is indicated that they are needed. -- FeralOink ( talk) 18:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. J04n( talk page) 04:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC) reply
There are no references provided to substantiate that this is not original research, or entirely fabricated. The concepts make sense, are rational, reasonable, but there is no indication as to when or from whom (neither deity nor person) that this concept originated.
While there are two references, both books, neither book is cited nor mentioned in the article itself. The reference section, which lists the books, does not specify the relevant chapter or page number or quote from either book; any of those would be supportive, probably adequate. The book titles don't indicate that they are about anything other than general theology. FeralOink ( talk) 18:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Finally, there are "citation needed" tags in the article that show it being tagged since 2008, yet no progress has been made in adding citations where it is indicated that they are needed. -- FeralOink ( talk) 18:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC) reply