The result was no consensus. No prejudice towards a merge discussion. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Listed on behalf of IP user. | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Original nomination: It is an original research largely by its creator as part of his series of work also of original research on the theme of the subject of the Conflict of laws; only an Israeli Jewish (religious) divorce can be recognized by civil authorities overseas, and that is only an automatic legal right in domestic law in the United Kingdom and in the Republic of Ireland; the article is unnecessarily, unacceptably and unreasonably hypothetical and legalistic, and ought to be merged with the main article, being Get (divorce document). 212.50.182.151 ( talk) 10:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. No prejudice towards a merge discussion. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Listed on behalf of IP user. | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Original nomination: It is an original research largely by its creator as part of his series of work also of original research on the theme of the subject of the Conflict of laws; only an Israeli Jewish (religious) divorce can be recognized by civil authorities overseas, and that is only an automatic legal right in domestic law in the United Kingdom and in the Republic of Ireland; the article is unnecessarily, unacceptably and unreasonably hypothetical and legalistic, and ought to be merged with the main article, being Get (divorce document). 212.50.182.151 ( talk) 10:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply