From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Christopher Reed

Christopher Reed (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed U.S. Senate Nominee, only reliable sources are about controversies. No reason to keep since he's never held office / Fails WP:NPOL and WP:N. Unsure about WP:GNG since there is coverage, that's the main discussion here. Redditaddict 6 9 13:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, nothing remarkable or notable, per GNG. Trivial. Kierzek ( talk) 18:00, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect and Merge - standard failure under WP:NPOL. While his statements about his opposition might have caused one-off flashes they both lacked any form of lasting coverage and not particularly outside the standard US political coverage during an election bid. Therefore neither NPOL or GNG satisfied. As he was only the actual candidate in one election, I believe it is standard form to redirect appropriately, here United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008 Nosebagbear ( talk) 14:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC) reply
It isn't critical, but it could be beneficial to merge the actual controversy details to the same location, Nosebagbear ( talk) 23:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Nominator Comment: I support a Redirect and/or Merge of the controversies over to the 2008 election. Redditaddict 6 9 02:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Christopher Reed

Christopher Reed (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed U.S. Senate Nominee, only reliable sources are about controversies. No reason to keep since he's never held office / Fails WP:NPOL and WP:N. Unsure about WP:GNG since there is coverage, that's the main discussion here. Redditaddict 6 9 13:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, nothing remarkable or notable, per GNG. Trivial. Kierzek ( talk) 18:00, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect and Merge - standard failure under WP:NPOL. While his statements about his opposition might have caused one-off flashes they both lacked any form of lasting coverage and not particularly outside the standard US political coverage during an election bid. Therefore neither NPOL or GNG satisfied. As he was only the actual candidate in one election, I believe it is standard form to redirect appropriately, here United States Senate election in Iowa, 2008 Nosebagbear ( talk) 14:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC) reply
It isn't critical, but it could be beneficial to merge the actual controversy details to the same location, Nosebagbear ( talk) 23:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Nominator Comment: I support a Redirect and/or Merge of the controversies over to the 2008 election. Redditaddict 6 9 02:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook