The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC) reply
This page describes software invented and sold by the article author. I've checked the internet and there is no evidence that this software is notable -- all links are to pages that sell the software (no independent software or music publisher has picked up the brand; all copies are sold directly by the article author, in some cases through aggregation sites like Amazon). Also, there appears to be no external review or credentialing. In other words, I can find no evidence that this product is notable in the sense that WP requires. Opus33 ( talk) 06:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Garyrader ( talk) It is not true that no independent software or music publisher has picked up the brand. I have edited the Christian Virtual Hymnal page to reflect the fact that Christian Book Distributors asked for a special gold version to publish themselves. They would not publish something like this unless they had closely reviewed it. Similarly for Apple. This program stands in a genre by itself. So I cannot compare it to any pages of similar programs at wikipedia. However I see that at least a quarter of the entries under scorewriters at wikipedia have no valid references/no independent publishers and I wonder why they are allowed to have wikipedia pages. Also the technology underlying the Christian Virtual Hymnal was picked up by independent music publishers: namely Integrity Music and Brentwood-Benson (now owned by Sony) as stated on the MusicEase page. The difference is that I used their content for them instead of the pd content used in the Christian Virtual Hymnal. I am kind of new at this so sorry if the format of this is not correct. Garyrader ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC) reply
This page describes software invented and sold by the article author. I've checked the internet and there is no evidence that this software is notable -- all links are to pages that sell the software (no independent software or music publisher has picked up the brand; all copies are sold directly by the article author, in some cases through aggregation sites like Amazon). Also, there appears to be no external review or credentialing. In other words, I can find no evidence that this product is notable in the sense that WP requires. Opus33 ( talk) 06:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Garyrader ( talk) It is not true that no independent software or music publisher has picked up the brand. I have edited the Christian Virtual Hymnal page to reflect the fact that Christian Book Distributors asked for a special gold version to publish themselves. They would not publish something like this unless they had closely reviewed it. Similarly for Apple. This program stands in a genre by itself. So I cannot compare it to any pages of similar programs at wikipedia. However I see that at least a quarter of the entries under scorewriters at wikipedia have no valid references/no independent publishers and I wonder why they are allowed to have wikipedia pages. Also the technology underlying the Christian Virtual Hymnal was picked up by independent music publishers: namely Integrity Music and Brentwood-Benson (now owned by Sony) as stated on the MusicEase page. The difference is that I used their content for them instead of the pd content used in the Christian Virtual Hymnal. I am kind of new at this so sorry if the format of this is not correct. Garyrader ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply