The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The BLP claims to be of a computer scientist, inventor, and an author. I can't find anything strong enough to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR. Quite low h-index of 5 on google scholar. RationalPuff ( talk) 17:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
oppose/keep The subject is primarily a computer scientist and inventor with 6 patented technologies with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as follows:
1. Absolute public key cryptographic system and method surviving private-key compromise with other advantages
2. Password self encryption method and system and encryption by keys generated from personal secret information
3. Codeless dynamic websites including general facilities
4. Dynamic Language Text Generation http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=24&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7721222&OS=7721222&RS=7721222
5. 3d Mouse For Computers https://uspto.report/patent/app/20200089339
6. Defeating solution to phishing attacks through counter challenge authentication
The author profile may not be that strong as per Google Scholar score, I completely agree, but as an inventor Wikipedia should consider the article as patents are granted after due assessment by the USPTO. Regarding general notability, the subject has been highlighted by the leading publications of India and Arab.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-info-tech/new-data-encryption-technique/article1750219.ece http://www.arabnews.com/node/290802
Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 18:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Phil Bridger, his patents have been tested in court too. Here are the facts and references:
*Patent 8023647
Here is the list of litigants for patent infringement case (all cases closed):
References:
https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2019-00498 https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/8023647 (under Related Cases, check PTAB (2) and Litigation (23) *Patent 7721222 Litigants in the patent infringement case were:
All cases closed. Reference: https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/UniversalCipherLLCvTargetCorporationDocketNo219cv00163EDTexMay072/1?1614374019
Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 22:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The above patent has received 45 citations from 30 assignees including technology companies like Sony, IBM, Microsoft, and Google.
Don't you think they establish his notability along with the coverage on leading newspapers like below:
? Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 08:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
David Eppstein thanks for the attention. Even we ignore the scholarly publications, is there no importance of the inventions? Citations of the patents are also an approval of the importance of the inventions. Don't they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk • contribs) 09:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi RationalPuff, if 'importance' is subjective, then members should reconsider the deletion nomination. Here are the usability or impact of the patents:
references: https://www.unifiedpatents.com/insights/2019/1/3/universal-cipher-formerly-cumberland-systems-patent-challenged-as-likely-invalid https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/8023647
Patent 7721222 or its Dynamic language text generation system and method has been used with phone and tablet devices. reference: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/walmart-target-sued-over-text-generation-tech-patent
Patent 7,721,222 has been cited by leading tech firms like Sony, IBM, Microsoft, and Google. Patent 8023647 has been used as citations by Apple Inc., Microsoft, Oracle and other significant technology firms.Who is citing the patent is more important than how many have used it as a citation. Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 22:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Requesting members to review the notability evidences shared on this page. I have improved the article also. Hope it is better now. Despite all, if you think deletion is the only way left, please respond to my comments. Waiting for your response. Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 09:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you User:GreenC what's your thought on citations from the following newspapers-based that are known for quality journalism with unbiased editorial practices:
Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 09:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:GreenC, XOR'easter, RationalPuff, Onel5969, David Eppstein, TT me, CommanderWaterford, improvements to the page regarding WP:GNG notability done based on citations from independent secondary sources in the print media in multiple languages:
Telulgu to English Translation: https://ia601502.us.archive.org/21/items/eenadu-paper-clip-cheman-shaik/Eenadu%20Paperclip%20Tamil%20to%20English%20Translation.pdf Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 20:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi RationalPuff, this book places Absolute Public Key Cryptography, one of the inventions, as one of the key crypto techniques. It's already there with ISBN number under Publications section: https://www.routledge.com/Handbook-of-Surveillance-Technologies/Petersen/p/book/9781439873151 Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 16:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Phil Bridger, please check this one. https://archive.org/details/handbook-of-surveillance-technologies-absolute-public-key-cryptography/page/n1/mode/2up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk • contribs) 17:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Phil Bridger, the author has mentioned the U.S. Patent #708882, I'm reading your patent troll thanks for sharing. Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 18:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The BLP claims to be of a computer scientist, inventor, and an author. I can't find anything strong enough to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR. Quite low h-index of 5 on google scholar. RationalPuff ( talk) 17:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
oppose/keep The subject is primarily a computer scientist and inventor with 6 patented technologies with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as follows:
1. Absolute public key cryptographic system and method surviving private-key compromise with other advantages
2. Password self encryption method and system and encryption by keys generated from personal secret information
3. Codeless dynamic websites including general facilities
4. Dynamic Language Text Generation http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=24&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7721222&OS=7721222&RS=7721222
5. 3d Mouse For Computers https://uspto.report/patent/app/20200089339
6. Defeating solution to phishing attacks through counter challenge authentication
The author profile may not be that strong as per Google Scholar score, I completely agree, but as an inventor Wikipedia should consider the article as patents are granted after due assessment by the USPTO. Regarding general notability, the subject has been highlighted by the leading publications of India and Arab.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-info-tech/new-data-encryption-technique/article1750219.ece http://www.arabnews.com/node/290802
Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 18:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Phil Bridger, his patents have been tested in court too. Here are the facts and references:
*Patent 8023647
Here is the list of litigants for patent infringement case (all cases closed):
References:
https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2019-00498 https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/8023647 (under Related Cases, check PTAB (2) and Litigation (23) *Patent 7721222 Litigants in the patent infringement case were:
All cases closed. Reference: https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/UniversalCipherLLCvTargetCorporationDocketNo219cv00163EDTexMay072/1?1614374019
Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 22:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The above patent has received 45 citations from 30 assignees including technology companies like Sony, IBM, Microsoft, and Google.
Don't you think they establish his notability along with the coverage on leading newspapers like below:
? Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 08:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
David Eppstein thanks for the attention. Even we ignore the scholarly publications, is there no importance of the inventions? Citations of the patents are also an approval of the importance of the inventions. Don't they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk • contribs) 09:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi RationalPuff, if 'importance' is subjective, then members should reconsider the deletion nomination. Here are the usability or impact of the patents:
references: https://www.unifiedpatents.com/insights/2019/1/3/universal-cipher-formerly-cumberland-systems-patent-challenged-as-likely-invalid https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/8023647
Patent 7721222 or its Dynamic language text generation system and method has been used with phone and tablet devices. reference: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/walmart-target-sued-over-text-generation-tech-patent
Patent 7,721,222 has been cited by leading tech firms like Sony, IBM, Microsoft, and Google. Patent 8023647 has been used as citations by Apple Inc., Microsoft, Oracle and other significant technology firms.Who is citing the patent is more important than how many have used it as a citation. Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 22:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Requesting members to review the notability evidences shared on this page. I have improved the article also. Hope it is better now. Despite all, if you think deletion is the only way left, please respond to my comments. Waiting for your response. Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 09:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you User:GreenC what's your thought on citations from the following newspapers-based that are known for quality journalism with unbiased editorial practices:
Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 09:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:GreenC, XOR'easter, RationalPuff, Onel5969, David Eppstein, TT me, CommanderWaterford, improvements to the page regarding WP:GNG notability done based on citations from independent secondary sources in the print media in multiple languages:
Telulgu to English Translation: https://ia601502.us.archive.org/21/items/eenadu-paper-clip-cheman-shaik/Eenadu%20Paperclip%20Tamil%20to%20English%20Translation.pdf Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 20:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi RationalPuff, this book places Absolute Public Key Cryptography, one of the inventions, as one of the key crypto techniques. It's already there with ISBN number under Publications section: https://www.routledge.com/Handbook-of-Surveillance-Technologies/Petersen/p/book/9781439873151 Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 16:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Phil Bridger, please check this one. https://archive.org/details/handbook-of-surveillance-technologies-absolute-public-key-cryptography/page/n1/mode/2up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk • contribs) 17:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Phil Bridger, the author has mentioned the U.S. Patent #708882, I'm reading your patent troll thanks for sharing. Wisdomwiki 40 ( talk) 18:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)