The result was delete. WP:NOTNEWS applies here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Original reason for PROD was "There are not enough third party sources to verify the historical significance of this match. This is also extremely likely to end up being loaded with POV." Reason given for removing PROD was "the "no historical significance" argument carries little weight, speaking from experience at AfD". The fact is that the only third party sources exist because the match happened yesterday, and there are no sources to indicate that, unlike the 1966 FIFA World Cup Final, this match will be historically significant in 50 years. – Pee Jay 13:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Koos ( talk) 11:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:NOTNEWS applies here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Original reason for PROD was "There are not enough third party sources to verify the historical significance of this match. This is also extremely likely to end up being loaded with POV." Reason given for removing PROD was "the "no historical significance" argument carries little weight, speaking from experience at AfD". The fact is that the only third party sources exist because the match happened yesterday, and there are no sources to indicate that, unlike the 1966 FIFA World Cup Final, this match will be historically significant in 50 years. – Pee Jay 13:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Koos ( talk) 11:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply