- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Changed
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Changed ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable video game – no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Only the game's page on Steam [1] (not independent) and a couple of reviews on blogs (not reliable) appear to exist, which is not enough to sustain an article. I should also note that I removed a game synopsis from the article as an apparent copyright violation of the game's page on Steam. Complex/ Rational 02:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Complex/ Rational 02:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG, with the sole ref being non-independent. The only reference I can find, other than obvious non-RS and non-SIGCOV sources, is this, which has some contributor guidelines stating that it will be reviewed by the editorial staff, though the staff has unclear qualifications, with the editor-in-chief having no subject-matter-expertise, so I don't think this site overall is a WP:RS. VickKiang (talk) 02:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. I came up empty on sources for the most part. Articles must pass WP:GNG to be included on Wikipedia as a general rule. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 03:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. A terrible title to search for, but I don't see any GNG-usable results. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 13:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per above, the game's notability just isn't enough to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 ( talk) 00:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per above Timur9008 ( talk) 22:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Steam is not a reliable third-party source, and we can't write a proper article about every game on Steam. Shooterwalker ( talk) 01:26, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet WP:GNG Lightburst ( talk) 17:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Changed
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Changed ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable video game – no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Only the game's page on Steam [1] (not independent) and a couple of reviews on blogs (not reliable) appear to exist, which is not enough to sustain an article. I should also note that I removed a game synopsis from the article as an apparent copyright violation of the game's page on Steam. Complex/ Rational 02:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Complex/ Rational 02:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG, with the sole ref being non-independent. The only reference I can find, other than obvious non-RS and non-SIGCOV sources, is this, which has some contributor guidelines stating that it will be reviewed by the editorial staff, though the staff has unclear qualifications, with the editor-in-chief having no subject-matter-expertise, so I don't think this site overall is a WP:RS. VickKiang (talk) 02:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. I came up empty on sources for the most part. Articles must pass WP:GNG to be included on Wikipedia as a general rule. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 03:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. A terrible title to search for, but I don't see any GNG-usable results. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 13:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per above, the game's notability just isn't enough to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 ( talk) 00:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - per above Timur9008 ( talk) 22:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Steam is not a reliable third-party source, and we can't write a proper article about every game on Steam. Shooterwalker ( talk) 01:26, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet WP:GNG Lightburst ( talk) 17:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.