The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Kemp may become notable as a starter for Michigan this coming fall, but does not yet meet the standards applicable under
WP:NCOLLATH. Also, I am not finding significant coverage in multiple reliable sources of the type needed to pass the
WP:GNG bar. Article was created in 2016 by a new user when Kemp was a highly-touted recruit. Still premature at this point.
Cbl62 (
talk)
18:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete no coverage exists that I can find to suggest passing
WP:GNG and the article doesn't suggest that it could be found. Subject may achieve notability in the future so no prejudice to re-create at that time.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
22:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Kemp may become notable as a starter for Michigan this coming fall, but does not yet meet the standards applicable under
WP:NCOLLATH. Also, I am not finding significant coverage in multiple reliable sources of the type needed to pass the
WP:GNG bar. Article was created in 2016 by a new user when Kemp was a highly-touted recruit. Still premature at this point.
Cbl62 (
talk)
18:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete no coverage exists that I can find to suggest passing
WP:GNG and the article doesn't suggest that it could be found. Subject may achieve notability in the future so no prejudice to re-create at that time.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
22:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.