- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Canesadooharie. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Canesadooharie River ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a recorded name used by Iroquois for a river, which has its own article at Canesadooharie. The identity of this river has been disputed, but there were never two rivers (or anything else) called Canesadooharie. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Disambiguations. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete: This article adds nothing new that is not already covered article at Canesadooharie. It is a duplicate article that is best deleted. Paul H. ( talk) 02:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Canesadooharie, as a plausible title. Pam D 08:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect if mentioned. No need for a DAB with only 1 entry and there doesn't appear to be others. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canesadooharie, since the page has existed for a while (not always as a disambiguation) and redirects are cheap. Hatman31 ( talk) 04:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Canesadooharie. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Canesadooharie River ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a recorded name used by Iroquois for a river, which has its own article at Canesadooharie. The identity of this river has been disputed, but there were never two rivers (or anything else) called Canesadooharie. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Disambiguations. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete: This article adds nothing new that is not already covered article at Canesadooharie. It is a duplicate article that is best deleted. Paul H. ( talk) 02:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Canesadooharie, as a plausible title. Pam D 08:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect if mentioned. No need for a DAB with only 1 entry and there doesn't appear to be others. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canesadooharie, since the page has existed for a while (not always as a disambiguation) and redirects are cheap. Hatman31 ( talk) 04:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.