The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Previous AfD ended in no consensus, but there was almost zero participation. Evidently there was a small burst of local coverage concerning the subject a few years ago. However, he does not appear to come anywhere close to satisfying either
WP:GNG or
WP:MUSICBIO. As he died earlier this year, unlikely he will garner any further notability.
Safiel (
talk)
02:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now - I found nothing even in the slightest good to suggest improvement and I would've like to see what newspapers the IP was talking about.
SwisterTwistertalk04:34, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: His death made news in Panama
[1][2], unfortunately the most detailed source
[3] appears to be largely copied from the
Spanish-language wikipedia article on him. His career mostly predates the rise of the web, particularly for Panama which wasn't the quickest country to adopt the technology, so there is probably some recentism at play here. It all adds up to a weak keep for me.
Vrac (
talk)
20:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - The article has only one working source (of the two it has) actually linking to content. I would be a delete vote, as I haven't found much with a quick search, but the Spanish Wikipedia (
Carlito Soul) contains one more source than the article here does (three). The article there also appears longer. Perhaps some translation could be done and the English Wikipedia article could be expanded.—
Godsy(
TALKCONT)05:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - I agree with Godsy "Perhaps some translation could be done and the English Wikipedia article could be expanded."
Noenorth (
talk)
04:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Previous AfD ended in no consensus, but there was almost zero participation. Evidently there was a small burst of local coverage concerning the subject a few years ago. However, he does not appear to come anywhere close to satisfying either
WP:GNG or
WP:MUSICBIO. As he died earlier this year, unlikely he will garner any further notability.
Safiel (
talk)
02:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now - I found nothing even in the slightest good to suggest improvement and I would've like to see what newspapers the IP was talking about.
SwisterTwistertalk04:34, 18 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: His death made news in Panama
[1][2], unfortunately the most detailed source
[3] appears to be largely copied from the
Spanish-language wikipedia article on him. His career mostly predates the rise of the web, particularly for Panama which wasn't the quickest country to adopt the technology, so there is probably some recentism at play here. It all adds up to a weak keep for me.
Vrac (
talk)
20:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - The article has only one working source (of the two it has) actually linking to content. I would be a delete vote, as I haven't found much with a quick search, but the Spanish Wikipedia (
Carlito Soul) contains one more source than the article here does (three). The article there also appears longer. Perhaps some translation could be done and the English Wikipedia article could be expanded.—
Godsy(
TALKCONT)05:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - I agree with Godsy "Perhaps some translation could be done and the English Wikipedia article could be expanded."
Noenorth (
talk)
04:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.