- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 01:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
CIA activities in Turkey
- CIA activities in Turkey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe that all of the "CIA activities in..." articles should be deleted—in fact, I'm a major contributor to two of the more notable ones, CIA activities in Iraq and CIA activities in Syria—but CIA activities in Turkey seems to fail WP:GNG. Perhaps merge any non-redundant material to, e.g., Turkey–United States relations? TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 23:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 November 3. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep: If we are going to have CIA activities by country articles allowable for the likes of Syria and Iraq, then the principle of having such county specific articles is established. So it will be down to individual article content to decide if an article is deserving for a particular country. Given the closeness to both Syria and Iraq, as well as Iran, and the fact that it shared a Cold War border with the Soviet Union and Iron Curtain countries, I think CIA activity in Turkey is likely to be both substantial and notable. I have already added some additional content, and there is likely to be much more content that could be added to this article. For example, the CIA connection to ARIT was always a well known open secret, and a google search turns up some sources on this. Tiptoethrutheminefield ( talk) 16:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep Per Tiptoe's comment. -- 92slim ( talk) 00:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 01:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
CIA activities in Turkey
- CIA activities in Turkey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe that all of the "CIA activities in..." articles should be deleted—in fact, I'm a major contributor to two of the more notable ones, CIA activities in Iraq and CIA activities in Syria—but CIA activities in Turkey seems to fail WP:GNG. Perhaps merge any non-redundant material to, e.g., Turkey–United States relations? TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 23:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 November 3. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 23:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep: If we are going to have CIA activities by country articles allowable for the likes of Syria and Iraq, then the principle of having such county specific articles is established. So it will be down to individual article content to decide if an article is deserving for a particular country. Given the closeness to both Syria and Iraq, as well as Iran, and the fact that it shared a Cold War border with the Soviet Union and Iron Curtain countries, I think CIA activity in Turkey is likely to be both substantial and notable. I have already added some additional content, and there is likely to be much more content that could be added to this article. For example, the CIA connection to ARIT was always a well known open secret, and a google search turns up some sources on this. Tiptoethrutheminefield ( talk) 16:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep Per Tiptoe's comment. -- 92slim ( talk) 00:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 20:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.