The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep' Frankly, this mass deletion of half a dozen CIA related articles feels a little aggressive. I admit to not knowing much about CIA activities, but this article clearly shows that there was significant discussion of CIA activity in Honduras in the late 20th century. What is certain is that CIA articles need better sourcing and more editors. Deletion does not seem to be a good way to achieve this.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
21:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep' Frankly, this mass deletion of half a dozen CIA related articles feels a little aggressive. I admit to not knowing much about CIA activities, but this article clearly shows that there was significant discussion of CIA activity in Honduras in the late 20th century. What is certain is that CIA articles need better sourcing and more editors. Deletion does not seem to be a good way to achieve this.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
21:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.