The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Defaulting to Keep w/o prejudice to a renomination at a future date. However I would encourage waiting a bit before sending this back to AfD to allow time for possible improvements in the article or clarification on how SUSTAINED the coverage is.
Ad Orientem (
talk) 00:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Simply
TOOSOON. It looks like she won Top Model yesterday, which means she's in her "15 minutes of fame" and fails
WP:BLP1E. Maybe try again in six months to a year?
Primefac (
talk) 15:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)reply
I also note that it's the twelfth season of the show, and if American Idol or X Factor are any indication, the further along we get the less notable these people become.
Primefac (
talk) 15:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep all the other winners have pages, the newest winner should have a presumption of notability as well. I might support an AfD of one of the 11 previous winners if they are not notable.
Power~enwiki (
talk) 18:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep: This page is notable and possesses citation, if as meager as the content in the article. –
Vami_IV✠ 10:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting this as none of the Keep comments addressed the actual requirements of GNG/BIO – if any !voter wishes clarification, they can contact me on my talk page please; (an acknowledgement to
Primefac for copying the talk page comments too to this Afd.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lourdes 12:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment The only possible claim for BIO is "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions."
Power~enwiki (
talk) 19:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ignoring the earliest three !votes as not policy-based, there is still no consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Exemplo347 (
talk) 13:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is on the bubble in terms of notability IMHO -- hinging on whether Germany's Next Top Model is a "significant" award -- but it's currently in okay shape. And, yes, the previous winners are already here too. --
Lockley (
talk) 23:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I'd say it's significant. It's a well known modelling competition, similar-ish to a beauty pageant. So in my opinion winners are covered by ANYBIO.
Linguisttalk|
contribs 20:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Well known competition, many search results come up in German - perhaps someone who speaks German can confirm reliable sourcing for those?
Earnsthearthrob (
talk) 16:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)reply
DELETE - Fails to
WP:TOOSOON and
WP:SUSTAINED. I don't think she warrants an article at this point, she needs more coverage over more time. -
GretLomborg (
talk) 03:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)reply
REDIRECT to
Germany's Next Topmodel (cycle 12), she's notable enough to be mentioned in that article, but not yet notable enough for a stand-alone article. - Tom |
Thomas.W talk 19:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Wrong forum or Keep No arguments for deletion have been made by any participant. Nor is there any reason to suspect that deletion arguments exist to delete either the topic or the edit history. As per
WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT, disputes that are attempts to use the deletion process for content discussion should be moved to the talk page of the article. Indeed, as per WP:BEFORE, a deletion discussion should have been preceded with discussions on the talk page of the article, which we don't have. So all paths lead to the talk page and away from deletion specialists making content decisions.
Unscintillating (
talk) 00:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - The arguments supporting this position appear to clearly be stronger. While
WP:TOOSOON is a valid concern, notability is also not temporary, and consensus has been that any winner of a national competition like this (as opposed to runners-up or other mere contestants) is notable.
Onel5969TT me 22:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Defaulting to Keep w/o prejudice to a renomination at a future date. However I would encourage waiting a bit before sending this back to AfD to allow time for possible improvements in the article or clarification on how SUSTAINED the coverage is.
Ad Orientem (
talk) 00:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Simply
TOOSOON. It looks like she won Top Model yesterday, which means she's in her "15 minutes of fame" and fails
WP:BLP1E. Maybe try again in six months to a year?
Primefac (
talk) 15:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)reply
I also note that it's the twelfth season of the show, and if American Idol or X Factor are any indication, the further along we get the less notable these people become.
Primefac (
talk) 15:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep all the other winners have pages, the newest winner should have a presumption of notability as well. I might support an AfD of one of the 11 previous winners if they are not notable.
Power~enwiki (
talk) 18:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep: This page is notable and possesses citation, if as meager as the content in the article. –
Vami_IV✠ 10:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting this as none of the Keep comments addressed the actual requirements of GNG/BIO – if any !voter wishes clarification, they can contact me on my talk page please; (an acknowledgement to
Primefac for copying the talk page comments too to this Afd.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lourdes 12:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment The only possible claim for BIO is "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions."
Power~enwiki (
talk) 19:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ignoring the earliest three !votes as not policy-based, there is still no consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Exemplo347 (
talk) 13:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is on the bubble in terms of notability IMHO -- hinging on whether Germany's Next Top Model is a "significant" award -- but it's currently in okay shape. And, yes, the previous winners are already here too. --
Lockley (
talk) 23:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)reply
I'd say it's significant. It's a well known modelling competition, similar-ish to a beauty pageant. So in my opinion winners are covered by ANYBIO.
Linguisttalk|
contribs 20:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Well known competition, many search results come up in German - perhaps someone who speaks German can confirm reliable sourcing for those?
Earnsthearthrob (
talk) 16:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)reply
DELETE - Fails to
WP:TOOSOON and
WP:SUSTAINED. I don't think she warrants an article at this point, she needs more coverage over more time. -
GretLomborg (
talk) 03:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)reply
REDIRECT to
Germany's Next Topmodel (cycle 12), she's notable enough to be mentioned in that article, but not yet notable enough for a stand-alone article. - Tom |
Thomas.W talk 19:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Wrong forum or Keep No arguments for deletion have been made by any participant. Nor is there any reason to suspect that deletion arguments exist to delete either the topic or the edit history. As per
WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT, disputes that are attempts to use the deletion process for content discussion should be moved to the talk page of the article. Indeed, as per WP:BEFORE, a deletion discussion should have been preceded with discussions on the talk page of the article, which we don't have. So all paths lead to the talk page and away from deletion specialists making content decisions.
Unscintillating (
talk) 00:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - The arguments supporting this position appear to clearly be stronger. While
WP:TOOSOON is a valid concern, notability is also not temporary, and consensus has been that any winner of a national competition like this (as opposed to runners-up or other mere contestants) is notable.
Onel5969TT me 22:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.