- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Michig ( talk) 07:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Bye Bye Sea
- Bye Bye Sea ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Three years have passed since the creation of the article, there is not one reliable source that discusses about the band. It clearly fails WP:GNG. TerryAlex ( talk) 20:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I would like to see references of the cameo TV appearances and references of the record label they're signed to. The article seems to suggest that the group has verifiable sources, yet none are referenced? If no references are added to back up the material written within the article, I would have to agree that this article fails to meet the requirements of having reliable and verifiable sources, in which case, delete. WeAreAllStars ( talk) 9:16, 16 January 2015 (EST)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (notify) @ 18:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The link to their official site is dead but I found much more info by searching with their Korean name, 안녕바다 through Naver. Seems they use Twitter and Facebook now instead, both of which are active. I got some hits in Korean media, as well, through Naver, including a long interview in the Kyunghyang Shinmun. Looks like they are not typical kpop and I think there is unlikely to be much info in English, but it's probably out there in Korean. Their Korean Wikipedia article is also short (like most KR WP articles) but indicates they released another album in 2013. I'm not saying they definitely pass notability, but I think they definitely could. edited to add: They are on Fluxus Music's homepage, so that much is legit. Shinyang-i ( talk) 22:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - just adding that if kept, this article should probably be moved to "Annyeong Bada" or "Annyeongbada", as I found no evidence they ever translate their name. The name was only transliterated (romanized) on Fluxus' site, not translated. BBS could redirect. Shinyang-i ( talk) 09:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, you can try adding a paragraph with some references to the article, because it does not look good right now. :)--
TerryAlex (
talk) 06:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm finding ample info in English now (under Annyeongbada) but it's all non-RS, as is most kpop stuff in English. There are RS in Korean but it'll take forever for me to translate them. I've tidied the article up a bit and added a source which is, at the moment, their site on Fluxus. It's not ideal but better than nothing. I'll try to do more in the next few days. Shinyang-i ( talk) 07:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, you can try adding a paragraph with some references to the article, because it does not look good right now. :)--
TerryAlex (
talk) 06:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 23:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 23:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Michig ( talk) 07:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Bye Bye Sea
- Bye Bye Sea ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Three years have passed since the creation of the article, there is not one reliable source that discusses about the band. It clearly fails WP:GNG. TerryAlex ( talk) 20:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I would like to see references of the cameo TV appearances and references of the record label they're signed to. The article seems to suggest that the group has verifiable sources, yet none are referenced? If no references are added to back up the material written within the article, I would have to agree that this article fails to meet the requirements of having reliable and verifiable sources, in which case, delete. WeAreAllStars ( talk) 9:16, 16 January 2015 (EST)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (notify) @ 18:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The link to their official site is dead but I found much more info by searching with their Korean name, 안녕바다 through Naver. Seems they use Twitter and Facebook now instead, both of which are active. I got some hits in Korean media, as well, through Naver, including a long interview in the Kyunghyang Shinmun. Looks like they are not typical kpop and I think there is unlikely to be much info in English, but it's probably out there in Korean. Their Korean Wikipedia article is also short (like most KR WP articles) but indicates they released another album in 2013. I'm not saying they definitely pass notability, but I think they definitely could. edited to add: They are on Fluxus Music's homepage, so that much is legit. Shinyang-i ( talk) 22:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - just adding that if kept, this article should probably be moved to "Annyeong Bada" or "Annyeongbada", as I found no evidence they ever translate their name. The name was only transliterated (romanized) on Fluxus' site, not translated. BBS could redirect. Shinyang-i ( talk) 09:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, you can try adding a paragraph with some references to the article, because it does not look good right now. :)--
TerryAlex (
talk) 06:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm finding ample info in English now (under Annyeongbada) but it's all non-RS, as is most kpop stuff in English. There are RS in Korean but it'll take forever for me to translate them. I've tidied the article up a bit and added a source which is, at the moment, their site on Fluxus. It's not ideal but better than nothing. I'll try to do more in the next few days. Shinyang-i ( talk) 07:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps, you can try adding a paragraph with some references to the article, because it does not look good right now. :)--
TerryAlex (
talk) 06:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 23:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 23:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.