- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Burn City
- Burn City ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails
WP:NSONG "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article;Fails
WP:NALBUM articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."
Flat Out (
talk) 23:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 04:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 04:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like this is actually an album, so NSONG shouldn't apply, but agreed that there's a lack of coverage of the recording, and I can't find any more sources. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Changing vote to Keep per Shaidar cuebiyar's additional sources and expanding of article. Good work. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 14:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Appeared on a national chart, passes WP:NALBUMS#2. shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 23:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - notability isn't enough if the article is a stub and likely to to remain a stub.
- Comment – now it becomes a matter of your opinion vs others. I believe it is now a start class article. I've expanded it further with a Reception section, adding reviews & refs. Aside: could you add your sig? shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 07:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - a national chart placing meets notability requirements - David Gerard ( talk) 13:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep satisfies WP: NALBUMS. Dan arndt ( talk) 15:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Burn City
- Burn City ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails
WP:NSONG "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article;Fails
WP:NALBUM articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."
Flat Out (
talk) 23:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 04:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 04:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like this is actually an album, so NSONG shouldn't apply, but agreed that there's a lack of coverage of the recording, and I can't find any more sources. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Changing vote to Keep per Shaidar cuebiyar's additional sources and expanding of article. Good work. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 14:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Appeared on a national chart, passes WP:NALBUMS#2. shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 23:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - notability isn't enough if the article is a stub and likely to to remain a stub.
- Comment – now it becomes a matter of your opinion vs others. I believe it is now a start class article. I've expanded it further with a Reception section, adding reviews & refs. Aside: could you add your sig? shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 07:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - a national chart placing meets notability requirements - David Gerard ( talk) 13:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep satisfies WP: NALBUMS. Dan arndt ( talk) 15:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.