- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given low input Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Budak Pailang
- Budak Pailang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet film notability guidelines. No references and no independent comments on the film. Google search shows that the film exists, but that isn't notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 02:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 02:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given low input Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Budak Pailang
- Budak Pailang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet film notability guidelines. No references and no independent comments on the film. Google search shows that the film exists, but that isn't notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 02:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 02:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.