The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not meet notability criteria. Non-notable commentator, and self-proclaimed expert. Article has no sources or substance, reads like a CV.
Ottawakismet (
talk) 15:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: Not only self-proclaimed.
NYT described him as one in 1991: "... experts like the Brookings Institution's Bruce Blair ..."
Sancho 22:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 04:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 02:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - needs more refs but he was frequently quoted in the year 2000 era. If we keep AfDing article because there aren't enough editors to beef them up, soon there won't be any wikipedia. Carolmooredc (
Talkie-Talkie) 00:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - he has been established as a notable authority on this subject cited in prominent publications, such as the NYT and Washington Post, and has testified before Congress. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jmars122 (
talk •
contribs) 01:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)reply
It's a shame that there are a lot of good people with lots of refs whose bios need updating. So many articles, so little time, even if you aren't obstructed. Sigh... Carolmooredc (
Talkie-Talkie) 03:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - a quick news search shows he has recently been quoted by many respectable news organization on nuclear weapons and security. User:shingkeeyu ([[User talk:shingkeeyu|Talk]) 10:30, 20 December 2013 (PST)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not meet notability criteria. Non-notable commentator, and self-proclaimed expert. Article has no sources or substance, reads like a CV.
Ottawakismet (
talk) 15:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: Not only self-proclaimed.
NYT described him as one in 1991: "... experts like the Brookings Institution's Bruce Blair ..."
Sancho 22:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 04:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 02:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - needs more refs but he was frequently quoted in the year 2000 era. If we keep AfDing article because there aren't enough editors to beef them up, soon there won't be any wikipedia. Carolmooredc (
Talkie-Talkie) 00:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - he has been established as a notable authority on this subject cited in prominent publications, such as the NYT and Washington Post, and has testified before Congress. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jmars122 (
talk •
contribs) 01:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)reply
It's a shame that there are a lot of good people with lots of refs whose bios need updating. So many articles, so little time, even if you aren't obstructed. Sigh... Carolmooredc (
Talkie-Talkie) 03:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep - a quick news search shows he has recently been quoted by many respectable news organization on nuclear weapons and security. User:shingkeeyu ([[User talk:shingkeeyu|Talk]) 10:30, 20 December 2013 (PST)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.