The result was Delete. Ironholds ( talk) 12:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Page is primarily a list of firms, with many firms who might meet the description missing. It seems a matter of pure subjective judgement as to who would be included, and if it is useful, better dealt with via the existing Bridge architects category. The definition at the top is essentially spurious - I doubt there are many practicing bridge designers who would agree with it, it is not in common use and indeed I have never seen it anywhere other than on this page. Kvetner ( talk) 13:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Ironholds ( talk) 12:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Page is primarily a list of firms, with many firms who might meet the description missing. It seems a matter of pure subjective judgement as to who would be included, and if it is useful, better dealt with via the existing Bridge architects category. The definition at the top is essentially spurious - I doubt there are many practicing bridge designers who would agree with it, it is not in common use and indeed I have never seen it anywhere other than on this page. Kvetner ( talk) 13:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC) reply