The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Piotrus's
PROD was removed by Michig so here we are at AfD and the best my searches found were only passing mentions with "Boxfresh British fashion label Roger Wade" at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam so hardly much to suggest even a minimally better notable and improvable article. Also notifying the only still active tagger
Rayman60.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. The PROD was not valid. There's enough coverage around if you look for it. Article improvement is a better alternative to bringing every article with issues to AfD. --
Michig (
talk) 06:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Obvious notability, and obvious lack of
WP:BEFORE. Laziness is not valid reasons for deletion.
Cavarrone 17:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per
Michig and
Cavarrone the firm's name is in two of the RS titles.
009o9 (
talk) 08:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep subject of the article meet
WP:GNG. I would have to agree with
Michig that article improvement is a better alternative to bringing every article with issues to AfD. It safe energy and time.
Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Close. Refs are cast iron, not sure what we're discussing. Snow keep.
Szzuk (
talk) 21:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Piotrus's
PROD was removed by Michig so here we are at AfD and the best my searches found were only passing mentions with "Boxfresh British fashion label Roger Wade" at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam so hardly much to suggest even a minimally better notable and improvable article. Also notifying the only still active tagger
Rayman60.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. The PROD was not valid. There's enough coverage around if you look for it. Article improvement is a better alternative to bringing every article with issues to AfD. --
Michig (
talk) 06:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Obvious notability, and obvious lack of
WP:BEFORE. Laziness is not valid reasons for deletion.
Cavarrone 17:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per
Michig and
Cavarrone the firm's name is in two of the RS titles.
009o9 (
talk) 08:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep subject of the article meet
WP:GNG. I would have to agree with
Michig that article improvement is a better alternative to bringing every article with issues to AfD. It safe energy and time.
Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Close. Refs are cast iron, not sure what we're discussing. Snow keep.
Szzuk (
talk) 21:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.