- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BookAuthority ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and NCORP. All 6 sources are interviews, blogs, routine coverage, business directory listings and trivial mentions. Not able to find any sources with significant coverage of the company Jeraxmoira ( talk) 07:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, United States of America, and California. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 07:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @
Jacob790 It's this deletion discussion which will decide whether or not to retain it. I see you arguing on the talk page. FYI:
User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_21#Crunchbase. Neutral. Seems to have some staying power.
RudolfoMD (
talk)
23:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- WHoops. @ Jacob0790 RudolfoMD ( talk) 23:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Sources found are just subject nominating others; nothing significant found and fails NCORP or GNG. Toadette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year) 11:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)- I have added new sections to present a more objective and neutral picture of the topic and included additional references.
Jacob0790 (
talk)
22:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- The 3 sources you added does not count towards GNG. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 09:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have added new sections to present a more objective and neutral picture of the topic and included additional references.
Jacob0790 (
talk)
22:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. I can find no significant coverage of the company or the website per WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BookAuthority ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and NCORP. All 6 sources are interviews, blogs, routine coverage, business directory listings and trivial mentions. Not able to find any sources with significant coverage of the company Jeraxmoira ( talk) 07:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, United States of America, and California. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 07:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @
Jacob790 It's this deletion discussion which will decide whether or not to retain it. I see you arguing on the talk page. FYI:
User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_21#Crunchbase. Neutral. Seems to have some staying power.
RudolfoMD (
talk)
23:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- WHoops. @ Jacob0790 RudolfoMD ( talk) 23:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Sources found are just subject nominating others; nothing significant found and fails NCORP or GNG. Toadette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year) 11:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)- I have added new sections to present a more objective and neutral picture of the topic and included additional references.
Jacob0790 (
talk)
22:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- The 3 sources you added does not count towards GNG. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 09:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have added new sections to present a more objective and neutral picture of the topic and included additional references.
Jacob0790 (
talk)
22:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. I can find no significant coverage of the company or the website per WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.