The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Although there does not seem to be that much significant coverage at the moment he appears to be a fairly prominent competitor.
[3]Zafir94 (
talk)
The sources mentioned at this discussion are a video highlight and two sources reporting on the same comments he made after a fight stating that he should be ranked by Bellator and deserved more recognition. Of course that was before he lost his next fight. Doesn't seem like significant independent coverage to me.
Papaursa (
talk)
15:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I went back to look at the sources for this article, besides the ones I commented on a few days ago. Fight announcements and results are typical for every fighter and are insufficient to confer WP notability. I don't see multiple instances of the significant independent coverage required to show WP notability. I have no objection to someone making a draft copy of this article to work on, but the AfD discussion needs to run its course.
Papaursa (
talk)
17:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Per Papaursa, as lacking notability. It is likely
too soon. An indication of a
pseudo biography or a
resume can be found when there is only professional accomplishments, which are only parts of a
BLP, and content such as "Starting his first fighting career...", "Starting out his MMA career...", and "King made his Bellator debut" are good indicators pointing to "just a resume". The elaborate "MMArecordbox" does not enhance an article as some seems to think and being a "fairly prominent competitor" is not a criteria to advance notability. --
Otr500 (
talk)
12:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Although there does not seem to be that much significant coverage at the moment he appears to be a fairly prominent competitor.
[3]Zafir94 (
talk)
The sources mentioned at this discussion are a video highlight and two sources reporting on the same comments he made after a fight stating that he should be ranked by Bellator and deserved more recognition. Of course that was before he lost his next fight. Doesn't seem like significant independent coverage to me.
Papaursa (
talk)
15:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I went back to look at the sources for this article, besides the ones I commented on a few days ago. Fight announcements and results are typical for every fighter and are insufficient to confer WP notability. I don't see multiple instances of the significant independent coverage required to show WP notability. I have no objection to someone making a draft copy of this article to work on, but the AfD discussion needs to run its course.
Papaursa (
talk)
17:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Per Papaursa, as lacking notability. It is likely
too soon. An indication of a
pseudo biography or a
resume can be found when there is only professional accomplishments, which are only parts of a
BLP, and content such as "Starting his first fighting career...", "Starting out his MMA career...", and "King made his Bellator debut" are good indicators pointing to "just a resume". The elaborate "MMArecordbox" does not enhance an article as some seems to think and being a "fairly prominent competitor" is not a criteria to advance notability. --
Otr500 (
talk)
12:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.