The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article seems to fail to meet WP notability requirements. In addition, while there is some local news coverage of individuals who have this credential, this may not satisfy the requirement that coverage be " Independent of the subject." This appears to be one membership level of the Association of Professional Chaplains (which is a professional organization whose WP article is only a redirect at this point) as described here. If the organization ever gets its own article, discussion of this credential is probably appropriate in that article per WP:NNC. But from what I have gathered, the credential itself is not notable enough to justify its own article. This conclusion is further supported by the fact that the article has been an orphan for a year. Novaseminary ( talk) 23:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article seems to fail to meet WP notability requirements. In addition, while there is some local news coverage of individuals who have this credential, this may not satisfy the requirement that coverage be " Independent of the subject." This appears to be one membership level of the Association of Professional Chaplains (which is a professional organization whose WP article is only a redirect at this point) as described here. If the organization ever gets its own article, discussion of this credential is probably appropriate in that article per WP:NNC. But from what I have gathered, the credential itself is not notable enough to justify its own article. This conclusion is further supported by the fact that the article has been an orphan for a year. Novaseminary ( talk) 23:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply