- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - Flori4nK T A L K 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Blue justice
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Blue justice ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not read like an encyclopedic article. A a s i m 17:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
This article as been proposed for deletion because it does not read like an encyclopedia entry. What can I do to edit this article to better conform to an encyclopedia entry? I've included academic sources and have tried to word it in a way that doesn't promotes advocacy, but rather capture a part of the research/discussions that are occuring around sustainable ocean development in the lead-up to the United Nations Ocean Decade on Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. Dalyocean ( talk) 17:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is notable although the article needs some rewriting. Mccapra ( talk) 18:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This seems to be a legitimate concept related to a theory called the Blue economy. While it does need heavy CE to conform with WP:MOS, that is something that can be undertaken without deletion. / Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 18:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I will address the comments above to have the article better conform to the WP:MOS. Thank you for your help. Dalyocean ( talk) 16:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - Flori4nK T A L K 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Blue justice
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Blue justice ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not read like an encyclopedic article. A a s i m 17:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
This article as been proposed for deletion because it does not read like an encyclopedia entry. What can I do to edit this article to better conform to an encyclopedia entry? I've included academic sources and have tried to word it in a way that doesn't promotes advocacy, but rather capture a part of the research/discussions that are occuring around sustainable ocean development in the lead-up to the United Nations Ocean Decade on Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. Dalyocean ( talk) 17:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is notable although the article needs some rewriting. Mccapra ( talk) 18:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This seems to be a legitimate concept related to a theory called the Blue economy. While it does need heavy CE to conform with WP:MOS, that is something that can be undertaken without deletion. / Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 18:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I will address the comments above to have the article better conform to the WP:MOS. Thank you for your help. Dalyocean ( talk) 16:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.