From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 22:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Black Dog Scotch Whisky (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to be a notable company and article is written more like an advert. Denniss ( talk) 15:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Keep: I created the article. I think the brand is notable. Its existence since 1883 would suggest that. The whisky is owned by United Spirits Limited (second largest spirit company by volume), and is one of the few Indian owned Scotch brands. The article cites several reliable sources, and the whisky has won several awards. There was also a "In popular culture" section which noted that the whisky was prominently mentioned in a Bollywood film, but that was also removed in that edit. I completely agree with the advert part. Unfortunately, that is the result of this recent edit, which among other things has used Facebook as a source. That just needs to be cleaned up (might do it when I get time). BigJolly9 ( talk) 15:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Very old brand, from a distiller created in 1883. The article is full of history of a company which I didn't know exist. Clearly notable. Good article, with good solid sources. scope_creep talk 18:11 12 October 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 22:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Black Dog Scotch Whisky (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to be a notable company and article is written more like an advert. Denniss ( talk) 15:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Keep: I created the article. I think the brand is notable. Its existence since 1883 would suggest that. The whisky is owned by United Spirits Limited (second largest spirit company by volume), and is one of the few Indian owned Scotch brands. The article cites several reliable sources, and the whisky has won several awards. There was also a "In popular culture" section which noted that the whisky was prominently mentioned in a Bollywood film, but that was also removed in that edit. I completely agree with the advert part. Unfortunately, that is the result of this recent edit, which among other things has used Facebook as a source. That just needs to be cleaned up (might do it when I get time). BigJolly9 ( talk) 15:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Very old brand, from a distiller created in 1883. The article is full of history of a company which I didn't know exist. Clearly notable. Good article, with good solid sources. scope_creep talk 18:11 12 October 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook