- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Fenix down ( talk) 22:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Billy Jervis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Billy Jervis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFOOTY due to playing in an era before the English Football League was "fully professional". More importantly fails WP:GNG due to complete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Bring back Daz Sampson ( talk) 20:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - playing in the Football League confers notability per WP:NFOOTBALL. Article needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 16:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I thought that was a funny little read, I am on the fence here, the article certainly has weaknesses. However, Football's Strangest Matches 1-86105-292-8 does actually provides a credible bit towards GNG. Govvy ( talk) 16:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Frankly, this is a ridiculous nomination that hasn't had any thought put into it. The man played for Gillingham and the article is a good start-class with four strong offline citations. No Great Shaker ( talk) 20:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep passes GNG and NFOOTY.-- Ortizesp ( talk) 14:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Fenix down ( talk) 22:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Billy Jervis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Billy Jervis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFOOTY due to playing in an era before the English Football League was "fully professional". More importantly fails WP:GNG due to complete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Bring back Daz Sampson ( talk) 20:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - playing in the Football League confers notability per WP:NFOOTBALL. Article needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 16:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I thought that was a funny little read, I am on the fence here, the article certainly has weaknesses. However, Football's Strangest Matches 1-86105-292-8 does actually provides a credible bit towards GNG. Govvy ( talk) 16:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Frankly, this is a ridiculous nomination that hasn't had any thought put into it. The man played for Gillingham and the article is a good start-class with four strong offline citations. No Great Shaker ( talk) 20:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep passes GNG and NFOOTY.-- Ortizesp ( talk) 14:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.