From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Blaze#Personalities. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines but an appropriate redirect has been supported. Davewild ( talk) 08:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Billy Hallowell (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journalist just doing his job. No significant independent coverage about him or his publications. The provided references fail to establish notability. GermanJoe ( talk) 19:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or maybe move to The Blaze#Personalities where he is mentioned - My searches of "Billy Hallowell journalist" at News, Books, browser and highbeam returned results but nothing significant so there's nothing to suggest solid independent notability at this time. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 02:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Blaze#Personalities. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines but an appropriate redirect has been supported. Davewild ( talk) 08:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Billy Hallowell (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journalist just doing his job. No significant independent coverage about him or his publications. The provided references fail to establish notability. GermanJoe ( talk) 19:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or maybe move to The Blaze#Personalities where he is mentioned - My searches of "Billy Hallowell journalist" at News, Books, browser and highbeam returned results but nothing significant so there's nothing to suggest solid independent notability at this time. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 02:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook