The result was no consensus for deletion, default to keep. Sandstein 17:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
POV fork to get around WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT Scjessey ( talk) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC) reply
This is very obviously a coatrack-type of POV fork designed to evade the rules at WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT. A campaign-related event with very little publicity. What little media coverage it received was in the context of the poorly-conducted TV debate in which the matter was raised. I recommend that this article be deleted. Only the BLP of Bill Ayers links to this page. -- Scjessey ( talk) 21:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Time to move on to Phony Flap 6,537,204.
Now how about getting back to the real campaign?
----but after awhile it just peters out. Presumably 'cause nobody proposed a demonstably better one?Article name
Just to throw this out here, is this article properly named? So far the controversy has involved McCain and The New York Times. Not to mention the whole NPOV issue with the title.. Perhaps something like The New York Times' John McCain lobbyist article would be better? (But then, that seems a bit long to me)--Bobblehead (rants) 19:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
The result was no consensus for deletion, default to keep. Sandstein 17:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
POV fork to get around WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT Scjessey ( talk) 21:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC) reply
This is very obviously a coatrack-type of POV fork designed to evade the rules at WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT. A campaign-related event with very little publicity. What little media coverage it received was in the context of the poorly-conducted TV debate in which the matter was raised. I recommend that this article be deleted. Only the BLP of Bill Ayers links to this page. -- Scjessey ( talk) 21:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Time to move on to Phony Flap 6,537,204.
Now how about getting back to the real campaign?
----but after awhile it just peters out. Presumably 'cause nobody proposed a demonstably better one?Article name
Just to throw this out here, is this article properly named? So far the controversy has involved McCain and The New York Times. Not to mention the whole NPOV issue with the title.. Perhaps something like The New York Times' John McCain lobbyist article would be better? (But then, that seems a bit long to me)--Bobblehead (rants) 19:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)