The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. OK, fair enough. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Beyond Beyond

Beyond Beyond (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to one review and a trailer. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep as imdb link page to external reviews shows 18 reviews here which include reliable sources such as Cinemagazine( dutch), Hollywood Reporter (Russia),Common sense media, and a number of French, German and Swedish rs for films. Passes WP:GNG including the already cited Variety review. Atlantic306 ( talk) 00:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Strong keep and suggest a courteous withdrawal by the well-intended nominator. Yes the article when first taken notice of by him was weak, but so what? When due diligence shows the topic (even a non-English one) has multiple sources available, inclusion criteria are met even if they're not in English or immediately used. I remind of WP:NEXIST and WP:HANDLE. and have grateful thanks to Tokyogirl79, for her simple improvements making notability quite clear. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Swedish Wikipedia also covers this film. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 13:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

and we also have multiple non-English searches. Were they performed?

Swedish:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Belgium:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brazil:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Germany:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Denmark:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Finland:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

France:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hungary:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Netherlands:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Norway:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Serbia:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Russia:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Slovenia:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Turkey:(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep per the sources and expansion from Michael. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.