The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep: Per sources, meets notability criterion
WP:NMUSIC#2, does not meet #3, and may meet #2 since the NZHerald review wasn't listed at the National Library, suggesting that there may be have been more reviews in print sources of the era, particularly NZ music magazines (of the two reviews listed at the NL, Rip It Up might not be sufficiently independent). Likely to appear in The Complete New Zealand Music Charts: 1966–2006. Downsides of merge/redirect
Wildside appear greater than keeping separate, but that's the other option since NMUSIC#2 means at least marginal notability. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~
(Talk)~04:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. This was a simple compilation album that did not receive any international coverage and by a majority of groups who also did not receive any international coverage. A review in the NZ Herald hardly counts for notability.
Ajf773 (
talk)
09:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Wildside Records. The chart position and the NZ Herald review show real world notability, but as a label compilation, discussing within the article on the label seems the best approach unless there's a significant amount to say about it (which there isn't). --
Michig (
talk)
08:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep: Per sources, meets notability criterion
WP:NMUSIC#2, does not meet #3, and may meet #2 since the NZHerald review wasn't listed at the National Library, suggesting that there may be have been more reviews in print sources of the era, particularly NZ music magazines (of the two reviews listed at the NL, Rip It Up might not be sufficiently independent). Likely to appear in The Complete New Zealand Music Charts: 1966–2006. Downsides of merge/redirect
Wildside appear greater than keeping separate, but that's the other option since NMUSIC#2 means at least marginal notability. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~
(Talk)~04:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. This was a simple compilation album that did not receive any international coverage and by a majority of groups who also did not receive any international coverage. A review in the NZ Herald hardly counts for notability.
Ajf773 (
talk)
09:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Wildside Records. The chart position and the NZ Herald review show real world notability, but as a label compilation, discussing within the article on the label seems the best approach unless there's a significant amount to say about it (which there isn't). --
Michig (
talk)
08:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.