From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep, withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 13:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Bert and Bertie

Bert and Bertie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:SIGCOV References are generally primary, routine announcements for directors who have been in the mainstream for a year. scope_creep Talk 01:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Ref 2 is a profile and is on one those clickbait x of y sites, that are used to drive adrvertising. It is a short profile. The 3rd reference is the only reference on that page. scope_creep Talk 12:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Reference 2 is from Variety, which is a reliable source as per WP:VARIETY NHCLS ( talk) 13:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Quality of sources don't seem to bother you. That first one is an annoucement and is not independent. The 2nd one Bertie, part of directing duo Bert and Bertie, told GamesRadar+ isn't independent either, it is part interview, all indicative of an very early careers. They are either reported in new annoucements of work, or connected to somebody else's context. They're isn't more than 1 secondary source here. That is the whole point of the Afd. scope_creep Talk 14:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - The two sources from WP:VARIETY and one from WP:THR meet the standard of WP:GNG. These are industry magazines for the industry they work in, so clearly they are considered notable in their own business. -- Krelnik ( talk) 20:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Welll I've done my bit for Blighty. I thought it was far too sono since they have been in the mainstream for less than a year and done sweet FA. How notability standards have dropped. Nomination Withdrawn. scope_creep Talk 21:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep, withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 13:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Bert and Bertie

Bert and Bertie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:SIGCOV References are generally primary, routine announcements for directors who have been in the mainstream for a year. scope_creep Talk 01:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Ref 2 is a profile and is on one those clickbait x of y sites, that are used to drive adrvertising. It is a short profile. The 3rd reference is the only reference on that page. scope_creep Talk 12:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Reference 2 is from Variety, which is a reliable source as per WP:VARIETY NHCLS ( talk) 13:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Quality of sources don't seem to bother you. That first one is an annoucement and is not independent. The 2nd one Bertie, part of directing duo Bert and Bertie, told GamesRadar+ isn't independent either, it is part interview, all indicative of an very early careers. They are either reported in new annoucements of work, or connected to somebody else's context. They're isn't more than 1 secondary source here. That is the whole point of the Afd. scope_creep Talk 14:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - The two sources from WP:VARIETY and one from WP:THR meet the standard of WP:GNG. These are industry magazines for the industry they work in, so clearly they are considered notable in their own business. -- Krelnik ( talk) 20:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Welll I've done my bit for Blighty. I thought it was far too sono since they have been in the mainstream for less than a year and done sweet FA. How notability standards have dropped. Nomination Withdrawn. scope_creep Talk 21:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook