- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If an editor wishes to create an article, depending on the election results, we can consider restoring this article to Draft space. But the consensus right now is with Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ben Obese-Jecty ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Candidates for UK Parliament are not automatically notable. Similarly, writing a few newspaper articles also does not confer notability. Propose deleting and if he is successful in his campaign, it would be appropriate to make a page once he is elected. Drerac ( talk) 17:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 18:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not pass WP:GNG, vast majority of sources cited in article are written by article subject. J2m5 ( talk) 02:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as the number of sources appears to indicate notability for journalism purposes as well as his political career. If the decision is not made to keep the article, moving to draft space would make more sense than deletion, which would only mean a well-written article most likely having to be recreated from scratch after the election if he wins. Chessrat ( talk, contributions) 07:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete looking at the history, was clearly created as a campaign ad. SportingFlyer T· C 04:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per WP:POLOUTCOMES. We have deleted literally hundreds of such articles, for all parties across all spectra and countries, in the past 17 years. Bearian ( talk) 13:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If an editor wishes to create an article, depending on the election results, we can consider restoring this article to Draft space. But the consensus right now is with Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ben Obese-Jecty ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Candidates for UK Parliament are not automatically notable. Similarly, writing a few newspaper articles also does not confer notability. Propose deleting and if he is successful in his campaign, it would be appropriate to make a page once he is elected. Drerac ( talk) 17:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 18:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not pass WP:GNG, vast majority of sources cited in article are written by article subject. J2m5 ( talk) 02:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as the number of sources appears to indicate notability for journalism purposes as well as his political career. If the decision is not made to keep the article, moving to draft space would make more sense than deletion, which would only mean a well-written article most likely having to be recreated from scratch after the election if he wins. Chessrat ( talk, contributions) 07:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete looking at the history, was clearly created as a campaign ad. SportingFlyer T· C 04:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per WP:POLOUTCOMES. We have deleted literally hundreds of such articles, for all parties across all spectra and countries, in the past 17 years. Bearian ( talk) 13:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.