From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Belgium in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Additional articles in the same series for consideration:

Denmark in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Germany in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Latvia in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Slovenia in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Wales in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV does not appear to be met with this series of articles. All relevant information is already contained within Eurovision Choir, Eurovision Choir of the Year 2017 and Eurovision Choir 2019, and separate articles outlining specific information for each country is unnecessary. The contest is currently on permanent hiatus, meaning that opportunities to develop these articles are non-existant, and there is very limited coverage outside of the "Eurovision bubble" which would support continuing to host these articles. Additionally, previous consensus has already been reached to delete country articles for similar contests, e.g. Turkvision Song Contest (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan in the Turkvision Song Contest and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest). Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 08:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Television, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Latvia, Slovenia, and Wales. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 09:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. If you strip out the "origins of the event" section which is information from the main Eurovision Choir article (and is a copy/paste in each of these articles), you're left with some prose saying the country participated, a table with two lines of participants, and a second table with two lines saying who commented on the performances on tv/radio. I find the commentators in the context of Choir to be WP:CRUFT. The participants are already included in each year's article ( 2017 and 2019). If there were more than two contests, perhaps these pages or a "list of entries" page could be appropriate. However, it's easy to just look at each year's page to see the country in question's participant. I see little need for these pages in a practical sense. With the future of the event unlikely, a redirect to keep open the possibility of expansion seems unnecessary. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Belgium in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Additional articles in the same series for consideration:

Denmark in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Germany in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Latvia in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Slovenia in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Wales in Eurovision Choir (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV does not appear to be met with this series of articles. All relevant information is already contained within Eurovision Choir, Eurovision Choir of the Year 2017 and Eurovision Choir 2019, and separate articles outlining specific information for each country is unnecessary. The contest is currently on permanent hiatus, meaning that opportunities to develop these articles are non-existant, and there is very limited coverage outside of the "Eurovision bubble" which would support continuing to host these articles. Additionally, previous consensus has already been reached to delete country articles for similar contests, e.g. Turkvision Song Contest (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan in the Turkvision Song Contest and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest). Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 08:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Television, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Latvia, Slovenia, and Wales. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 09:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. If you strip out the "origins of the event" section which is information from the main Eurovision Choir article (and is a copy/paste in each of these articles), you're left with some prose saying the country participated, a table with two lines of participants, and a second table with two lines saying who commented on the performances on tv/radio. I find the commentators in the context of Choir to be WP:CRUFT. The participants are already included in each year's article ( 2017 and 2019). If there were more than two contests, perhaps these pages or a "list of entries" page could be appropriate. However, it's easy to just look at each year's page to see the country in question's participant. I see little need for these pages in a practical sense. With the future of the event unlikely, a redirect to keep open the possibility of expansion seems unnecessary. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook