The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 22:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
For an unreleased album to be notable, per WP:CRYSTALBALL, it should be notable even if it is not released. (This is because albums are regularly delayed/cancelled, so are not "almost certain to take place".)
The existence of a minimal amount of routine information is not suited to a standalone article, but to incorporation in the existing article on the band—or, in the article " Part of the Band", which is notable due to a significant number of in-depth reviews and analyses. Mostly unsourced speculation about the album details, such as claimed track lengths, and a track listing that has been published by the band but will be subject to change, are not solid grounds for an article.
The current sourcing is: two primary sources (YouTube videos); three routine NME sources giving the very little publicly available information about the album; two sources where notability is conferred on "Part of the Band" but not inherited to the album.
Attempts to redirect have been quashed through edit warring by a recreating user that has not engaged in discussion yet. — Bilorv ( talk) 23:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
In a few special cases, an unreleased album may qualify for an article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it ... generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label.The title, track listing and release date have been given. — Bilorv ( talk) 16:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 22:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
For an unreleased album to be notable, per WP:CRYSTALBALL, it should be notable even if it is not released. (This is because albums are regularly delayed/cancelled, so are not "almost certain to take place".)
The existence of a minimal amount of routine information is not suited to a standalone article, but to incorporation in the existing article on the band—or, in the article " Part of the Band", which is notable due to a significant number of in-depth reviews and analyses. Mostly unsourced speculation about the album details, such as claimed track lengths, and a track listing that has been published by the band but will be subject to change, are not solid grounds for an article.
The current sourcing is: two primary sources (YouTube videos); three routine NME sources giving the very little publicly available information about the album; two sources where notability is conferred on "Part of the Band" but not inherited to the album.
Attempts to redirect have been quashed through edit warring by a recreating user that has not engaged in discussion yet. — Bilorv ( talk) 23:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
In a few special cases, an unreleased album may qualify for an article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it ... generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label.The title, track listing and release date have been given. — Bilorv ( talk) 16:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)