- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If someone wants to work on a draft version of this article feel free to do so or contact WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Battle of Koyulhisar (1461) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fail to see how this is WP:NOTABLE. There are barely two lines about this battle, which are unsourced. Didn't find anything impressive at Google ebooks neither, nor the Aqquyunlu book of John E. Woods. HistoryofIran ( talk) 23:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Turkey. Owen× ☎ 23:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A poorly-worded/sourced article on a battle with little long-term historical significance, which doesn't justify a standalone article. Aintabli ( talk) 01:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Another opinion could be moving this to a draft named Siege of Koyulhisar (1461), see [1]. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 12:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I prepared this article, but ı see only that it has been heavily edited and filled with ridiculous misinformation. It would be appropriate to delete the article.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If someone wants to work on a draft version of this article feel free to do so or contact WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Battle of Koyulhisar (1461) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fail to see how this is WP:NOTABLE. There are barely two lines about this battle, which are unsourced. Didn't find anything impressive at Google ebooks neither, nor the Aqquyunlu book of John E. Woods. HistoryofIran ( talk) 23:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Turkey. Owen× ☎ 23:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A poorly-worded/sourced article on a battle with little long-term historical significance, which doesn't justify a standalone article. Aintabli ( talk) 01:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Another opinion could be moving this to a draft named Siege of Koyulhisar (1461), see [1]. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 12:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I prepared this article, but ı see only that it has been heavily edited and filled with ridiculous misinformation. It would be appropriate to delete the article.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.