- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Battle of Dushanbe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The creator of the article was just blocked for socking [see [1]), this was already deleted before [2], the sockpuppeteer's previous creations of this article on some other wikis had some clear vandalism signs [3] [4], these are some previous discussions about the edits of this sockpuppeteer that show verifiability issues and misuse of sources: [5] [6] [7]. I asked @ HistoryofIran who is familiar with sockpuppeteer on article talk page [8] and they said it's likely not notable. This sockpuppeteer has done some sneaky vandalism and demonstrated using fake references, misusing sources with their edits multiple times. So I feel this might have verifiability issues, even if it doesn't, it's probably not notable for a seperate article. Tehonk ( talk) 19:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Central Asia, Tajikistan, and Russia. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 19:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Battle of Dushanbe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The creator of the article was just blocked for socking [see [1]), this was already deleted before [2], the sockpuppeteer's previous creations of this article on some other wikis had some clear vandalism signs [3] [4], these are some previous discussions about the edits of this sockpuppeteer that show verifiability issues and misuse of sources: [5] [6] [7]. I asked @ HistoryofIran who is familiar with sockpuppeteer on article talk page [8] and they said it's likely not notable. This sockpuppeteer has done some sneaky vandalism and demonstrated using fake references, misusing sources with their edits multiple times. So I feel this might have verifiability issues, even if it doesn't, it's probably not notable for a seperate article. Tehonk ( talk) 19:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Central Asia, Tajikistan, and Russia. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 19:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.