From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Pamzeis ( talk) 11:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Barbara De Fina

Barbara De Fina (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't actually find reliable news coverage of De Fina. The claims to notability are twofold: the marriage to Scorsese (notability isn't inherited, so that's no good), and her being a producer. I just don't see how she meets WP:PRODUCER however. She's not a co-creator, her body of work is not particularly impressive, and she doesn't meet the other criteria. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 23:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I have made edits to the article, it now has sources and a list of her awards, as well as an EL. Because of her multiple award wins and nominations, and per the earlier comments, I agree that she meets WP:PRODUCER. I have found other sources that show her significance, for instance Charlie Rose has interviewed her (by herself, not with Scorcese) twice. There are other video links that would be useful but would take some time to go through. So I vote keep. -- Krelnik ( talk) 00:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Pamzeis ( talk) 11:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Barbara De Fina

Barbara De Fina (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't actually find reliable news coverage of De Fina. The claims to notability are twofold: the marriage to Scorsese (notability isn't inherited, so that's no good), and her being a producer. I just don't see how she meets WP:PRODUCER however. She's not a co-creator, her body of work is not particularly impressive, and she doesn't meet the other criteria. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 23:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I have made edits to the article, it now has sources and a list of her awards, as well as an EL. Because of her multiple award wins and nominations, and per the earlier comments, I agree that she meets WP:PRODUCER. I have found other sources that show her significance, for instance Charlie Rose has interviewed her (by herself, not with Scorcese) twice. There are other video links that would be useful but would take some time to go through. So I vote keep. -- Krelnik ( talk) 00:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook