The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I created this page without right thinking. Also this page and I (who created it) are marred by the "debate" at its talk page. I think things will go better if this page goes deleted, as part of my process of semi-retiring. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect (with no prejudice towards recreation at a later date if the situation warrants it). This article has some information and sources that should be added to
Navotas whatever the decision here. The table here is more informative (although we don't need to merge the decorative pictures and the 2010 column should be left of the 2015 column), and the former barangays have sources here whereas they are unsourced in the Navotas article. Given the current short length of both these articles, the information here would easily fit within the scope of
Navotas. It can be split off if it expands to detail that would be undue for the Navotas article.
CMD (
talk)
10:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I created this page without right thinking. Also this page and I (who created it) are marred by the "debate" at its talk page. I think things will go better if this page goes deleted, as part of my process of semi-retiring. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect (with no prejudice towards recreation at a later date if the situation warrants it). This article has some information and sources that should be added to
Navotas whatever the decision here. The table here is more informative (although we don't need to merge the decorative pictures and the 2010 column should be left of the 2015 column), and the former barangays have sources here whereas they are unsourced in the Navotas article. Given the current short length of both these articles, the information here would easily fit within the scope of
Navotas. It can be split off if it expands to detail that would be undue for the Navotas article.
CMD (
talk)
10:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.